Introduction

       The scientists have explained in different ways the reasons why individuals united into the community: people need each other to satisfy theirs needs, Platoon said that man “has a social instinct “, but Aristotle objected to him that the community itself is “nature creation”.
Under the circumstances people have to (on social treaty) submit to being controlled, which creates” moral and collective unity”, claimed Russo.

       O. Kont considered the society to be the result of general law of complication and harmony of any systems, and the society is a complicated organized unity whose elements are not individuals but social establishments – families, parties, states and etc. It is possible to contradict to Kont, saying that any social institution consists of individuals. Individual is an inseparable part of a society which is a unity of them. But what unity - volunteering or compulsory? Organized or spontaneous?

       However, it seems that a man is not asked about this, he gets into society as soon as he was born, when he has not got any will as well as freedom to decide himself to be or not a member of the society. Involvement of the individual into the society, his socialization is an objective process independent from will and consciousness of the individual. The society ensnares him by transparent web of relations, mutual interests, incentives and compulsions.

       As the man is growing up, acquiring knowledge his need to autonomy is growing too, as well as his degree of freedom of will, and consequently , there appears danger that his behavior will not be the same as other people’s , he can decline from socially accepted rules and society’s sensibility. The inside tension between the society and an individual is growing threatening to result in conflict where the individual wish to build his own life according to his criteria collide into society’s aim to subject individual’s wishes to social prosperity.

       The conflict itself is constant and useful because its solution leads to negative consequences - individualism victory leads to anarchy, society’s victory over the individual – to totalitarism, destruction of personality. Eventually, there are fewer initiative, creative personalities who are able to make innovations, independent decisions and be responsible for them.